Applicants With Disability: Access and Adjustments
Asking for an adjustment is an administrative process, not a confession. The candidates who struggle are usually the ones who left the request until the week of the interview.
If you have a disability, a chronic health condition, a mental health condition or a specific learning difference, the interview raises a question most other applicants never think about: do I ask for something, and will asking count against me?
The short answers are usually yes and no. Adjustments to the interview process are ordinary administrative business at Australian and New Zealand universities, which operate under disability discrimination law and, in Australia, the Disability Standards for Education. Requests are handled by admissions and accessibility staff, not by the people marking you. But the process has deadlines, and the applicants who end up disadvantaged are almost always the ones who asked too late.
Two conversations that get confused
The first conversation is about access to the assessment: can you demonstrate your actual ability in this interview, or does the format itself get in the way? That is what an adjustment is for. It does not change the standard you are marked against. It changes the conditions so the mark reflects you rather than the logistics.
The second conversation is about inherent requirements: the abilities a medical program says are essential to complete it, which most schools publish as a formal statement. That is a separate discussion, usually held after an offer, and often a productive one, because programs are frequently more flexible in practice than a bare document suggests.
Applicants often avoid asking for an interview adjustment because they fear it triggers the second conversation. Treat them as separate, because the university does. If you want to understand a school's inherent requirements, read them on that school's current admissions or student support pages and, if you have questions, ask the accessibility service directly rather than guessing.
Ask early, because the timeline is tight
Interview invitations often arrive two to four weeks before the interview itself. Arranging an interpreter, a captioner, an accessible room or a modified circuit takes time, and documentation from a treating practitioner can take longer than you expect to obtain.
Practical sequence: find the accessibility or admissions contact for each school you applied to well before invitations go out, ask what their process and cut off dates are for interview adjustments, and get your supporting documentation ready in advance. Then, the day your invitation arrives, submit the request. Do not wait to see whether you feel you need it.
What is typically available
Availability varies by school, by format and by year, and nothing here is a guarantee. Adjustments that universities commonly consider include:
- Extra reading time at each station, or the prompt provided in advance of the timed component.
- Prompts in large print, in an accessible digital format, or read aloud.
- Rest breaks between stations, or a longer break partway through a circuit.
- A static room where assessors rotate to you instead of you moving between rooms, which removes the walking and the corridor time pressure.
- Auslan interpreters, live captioning, or an assistive listening system, and clear sightlines for lip reading.
- Step free access, accessible bathrooms nearby, and a quiet waiting area away from a crowded holding room.
- Permission to have medication, food, water or medical equipment with you, and to use it without explaining yourself on the day.
- Scheduling adjustments, such as a session at a time of day that suits a condition with a predictable pattern.
- Access for an assistance animal, or for a support person in the building.
Ask for what solves your specific problem rather than choosing from a menu. Universities can usually accommodate a clearly described need more easily than a vague one.
How to write the request
Keep it factual and functional. You do not owe anyone your medical history, and staff do not need it. Three sentences usually do the job: what the functional impact is, what adjustment addresses it, and what documentation you can provide.
For example: I have a condition that affects reading speed under time pressure. I am requesting additional reading time at each station, or the prompt in advance. I have a report from my treating specialist and can supply it in the format you require. That is enough to start the process, and the accessibility service will tell you what else they need.
If you have had adjustments before, for school exams, for the UCAT, or in your current degree, say so and attach the evidence. An existing record of adjustment makes approval faster.
Who sees it
Generally, adjustment requests are handled by administrative and accessibility staff, and assessors are told only what they need in order to run your station properly. An assessor may know that you have extra reading time. They typically do not receive your diagnosis or your documentation.
That said, information handling differs between institutions, and you are entitled to ask. A direct question such as who will see this information, and what will assessors be told, is completely reasonable and universities answer it routinely.
Whether to mention it in your answers
This is your call and there is no correct answer. Some candidates have a genuinely strong story about their own experience of the health system, and it can be powerful material for questions about resilience, empathy or what shaped their interest in medicine. Others would rather be assessed on everything else, which is equally legitimate. Work through the common station types in our guide to MMI interview questions in Australia and decide in advance, so you are not making the decision live under time pressure.
If you do use it, two things make it land. Be the agent in the story rather than the patient in it: what you did, decided or learned. And do not turn it into a plea. Assessors respond to insight, not to hardship on its own.
Format changes the access problem
A circuit involves repeated movement, corridor noise, bright rooms, standing, and a long day. A panel involves sitting still for a sustained period with fewer breaks. They create different barriers, and knowing which you face lets you request the right thing. Our comparison of MMI and panel interviews in Australia sets out the practical differences.
Some schools run distinctive structured formats rather than a standard circuit, such as the Newcastle Joint Medical Program interview, and online delivery brings its own accessibility considerations around captioning, screen readers and platform compatibility. Confirm the format and delivery method for your interview on the university's current admissions page, then ask the accessibility service about that specific format.
On the day, and afterwards
Bring the confirmation email of your approved adjustments, printed. Occasionally a station volunteer has not been briefed, and a short polite sentence with the email in hand resolves it in seconds. If an approved adjustment is not provided, or something goes wrong that materially affected your performance, raise it with the admissions office the same day rather than a week later. Most schools have a process for that, and contemporaneous reports carry more weight.
Preparation matters here too, and practising in conditions close to your approved ones is worth more than generic practice. MasterMed's live AI interviewer runs timed MMI stations and marks you against a rubric, on your own schedule and in your own space, which suits anyone managing energy or a fluctuating condition. The first speaking station is free on the trial, no card, and the trial never converts by itself.
Last thing, and it is the point of all of this: asking for an adjustment is not asking for a favour. It is asking to be assessed on your ability rather than on the design of the room. Ask early, ask specifically, and get it in writing.
- Interview
- Accessibility
- Equity
- MMI
- Admissions